Awards @ Psychology, Neurology and Neuroscience
Longdom Awards support a point in perceiving exceptional accomplishments and commitments of experts and analysts nearby in Medical, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Health Care, and Engineering. Longdom Scientific Committee, a panel inside the Advisory Council, is liable for suggesting people for grants for thought and endorsement. Longdom grants are classified as best speaker talks, best conceptual, best banner honor, exceptional youthful scientist grant, and place of representative honors. Grants are introduced every year at the scene of the Longdom gathering gatherings. Victors of the honors will be considered to have introduced a unique logical or specialized examination exploring a novel application or a creative exploration approach, of a standard appropriate for distribution at a global level.
OUTSTANDING SPEAKER AWARDS
The award’s objective is to encourage participants to be innovative in the way the research work is delivered to engage the audience.
Judging Criteria:
Originality (weighting 15%) – original research contributing to a cumulative knowledge base of the field that is likely to inspire peers and has not been presented previously
Research method (weighting 15%) – scientifically sound contention/conclusion supported by robust evidence with critical and coherent analysis
Presentation style (weighting 70%) – novel, innovative, entices a high level of engagement and effective mechanism to deliver the research work concepts and conclusions
BEST ABSTRACT AWARDS
All abstracts/papers submitted are critically reviewed by the Scientific Committee as to their eligibility and suitability. They are rated based on the quality of the presentation content, the educational value, and the quality of the written abstract. The conference (congress) will offer awards to the three best abstracts (First, Second, and Third).
A “Certificate of Appreciation” will be given to 2nd and 3rd nominations from the participant abstracts of the conference.
Please note that:The jury will only consider the nominated speakers for the Best Abstracts awards selection. The jury will evaluate the nominated abstracts according to; uniqueness, title, abstract, and keywords.
The applicants of the Best Abstracts Awards should register for the conference. The nominated abstracts will not be evaluated in case of not fulfilling the registration requirements.
The awards will be announced at the closing ceremony of the conference and the author(s) of the nominated abstracts should be present at the opening ceremony.
BEST POSTER AWARDS
The conference will offer the Best Poster Award to the three best posters (First, Second, and Third).
Please read the guidelines below carefully:
All posters will automatically be considered for the Poster Award.2 reviewers will select the best posters. The winners will be formally announced during the closing ceremony. The three winners of the Poster Award will receive award certificates.
The posters will be evaluated in terms of; design and layout, coherence, argumentation + methodology, awareness of previous work, attractiveness, message and main points, balance of text visuals, and overall impression.
Poster Size: The poster size should be approximately 1x1 M long. Please choose an upright format and keep in mind that the font sizes should be big enough to allow your poster to be read from some distance. We suggest using fonts Arial/Times New Roman and font sizes of 22 – 24 pt. for texts and 60 – 70 pt. for headings. You are kindly asked to bring your poster fully assembled and printed.