Longdom Awards support an aim to recognize outstanding achievements and contributions of professionals and researchers in the areas of Medical, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Health Care, and Engineering.
Longdom Scientific Committee, a committee within the Advisory Council, is responsible for recommending individuals for awards for consideration and approval. Longdom Awards are categorized as Best Speaker Talks, Best Abstract, Best Poster Award, Outstanding Young Researcher Award, and House of Delegate Award. Awards are presented annually at the venue of the Longdom Conferences. Winners of the awards will be considered to have presented an original scientific or technical study investigating a novel application or an innovative research approach, of a standard suitable for publication at an international level.
The award’s objective is to encourage participants to be innovative in the way the research work is delivered to engage the audience.
Judging Criteria:
Originality (weighting 15%) – original research contributing to a cumulative knowledge base of the field that is likely to inspire peers and has not been presented previously
Research method (weighting 15%) – scientifically sound contention/conclusion supported by robust evidence with critical and coherent analysis
Presentation style (weighting 70%) – novel, innovative, entices a high level of engagement and effective mechanism to deliver the research work concepts and conclusions
BEST POSTER AWARDS:
The conference will offer the Best Poster Award for the three best posters (First, Second and Third).
Please read the guidelines below carefully:
Best Abstract Awards:
All abstracts/papers submitted are critically reviewed by the Scientific Committee as to their eligibility and suitability. They are rated based on the quality of the presentation content, the educational value, and the quality of the written abstract. The conference (congress) will offer awards to the three best abstracts (First, Second, and Third). A “Certificate of Appreciation” will be given to the 2nd and 3rd nominations from the participant abstracts of the conference.
Please note that; the jury will only consider the nominated speakers for the Best Abstracts Awards selection. The jury will evaluate the nominated abstracts according to uniqueness, title, abstract, and keywords.
The applicants for the Best Abstracts Awards should register for the conference. The nominated abstracts will not be evaluated in case of not fulfilling the registration requirements. The awards will be announced at the closing ceremony of the conference and the author(s) of the nominated abstracts should be present at the opening ceremony.